Enter Link |
Enter Link |
Enter Link |
Enter Link |
Enter Link |
ANSWERS TO EMAILS. |
Name omitted 9/7/00 Thank you for your interest and inquiry. On 9/6/00 you wrote: Hi, I read your testamony. It was wonderful. I am confused about the christian church being in the great whore doctrine. Would you please explain what you mean by that? thank you.....Name omitted Name omitted, if you would go to the book of Revelation chapter 17, you may read of the great whore that sits upon a beast. You can see the characteristics of the beast and the woman. Please don't forget to see that she is the mother of harlots, plural, as well as being the great whore. This same chapter even tells us that she is a city that sits on seven hills. Rome is known as the City of Seven Hills..... The Vatican sits on Mount Vaticanus, which means mountain of divination. The Roman Catholic Church claims to be the mother of all churches. All "Christian" denominations use the names of pagan deities to refer to our Heavenly Father and His Son and worship on days set apart to sun worship instead of the days set apart to Him by Him according to Scripture. You can then go to the Final Reformation link on the Names page or on the home page of the site. Scroll down to the grid listing components of sun worship and you may read of how these things all tie together in paganism, the same paganism that perverts the true belief. This should help to clarify things for you. If you have further questions, please feel free to email me any time. Peace and blessings on you. In Messiah's love, David ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ |
On 01-19-2002 A Pagan wrote, I was really intrtigued by the question you posed on your site as to whether or not the church has become a pagan religion.... The best thing that I can point out is that the church changes it's views on many issues concerning paganism. When Pope Gregory sent his minions into northern Europe to "spread the good word", he ran into much trouble w/ the pagans that lived there. His solutions to these "problems" are what changed both religions dramatically. First, he made his minions burn down the temples where the people worshipped, and to raise His churches upon the ashes thereof. The next cataclysmic change was to rearrange the christian calendar so that the holidays would somewhat coincide w/ each other (with all the baby animals, do you really think that Christ was born in the middle of the winter?). And finally, his greatest blasphemy to ALL faith was to cannonise the Gods of the "old religion" so as to further entice the simple folk to conversion to the Christian faith. It is quite apparent that it really is simple. The people came to His churches and continued to worship THEIR Gods. Has Christianity become a pagan religion? The answer is a resounding YES and it is the fault of the church itself. Sadly the church is responsible for attrocities against humanity even worse than this, but that is another discussion all together. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ My Response to this man was: Hello Name omitted, Thank you for writing. This was an excellent commentary. I personally like to ask people thequestions and let them find the answers for themselves. :-) However, I was wondering, would you mind me posting your email on my site with others who have responded? I believe it may just help people come to the proper conclusion. Please let me know. It doesn't need to have your name on it if you prefer. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ This person responded: I would be happy for you to post the email with one stipulation. That it is known that this was a response FROM a pagan. Best Wishes, Name Omitted ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ The thing I find most astounding, even appauling is the fact that most of the pagans that I have been contacted by are more knowledgeable about the history and state of the church than those who call themselves "Christians." Perhaps this is why the Scripture says, "My people perrish for lack of knowledge." |
(Name omitted)@aol.com wrote: I'm not trying to be mean, however these questions are honest and sincere not vicious. I understand about Yahweh and often times refer to my NJB and have wondered about the name Jesus and why we don't call Him Yahsua. I came upon your site researching Babylon. So if you would please answer my questions I would greatly appreciate it. What faith are you and what started you on this study? How do you know that you're not going astray, tossed to and fro by every wind of doctrine? Where did you begin and whose books did you trust? Thank You, (Name omitted) ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Hello (Name omitted), Thank you for writing. Um, well, I don't see your questions as vicious at all. If you are looking for a denomination to put me in so you have a category to place me in, there isn't one. I would that there was a denomination or group of believers with whom I could fellowship with and take my family to. So far, I haven't found one. We have had fellowship with others in the past. However, some I can not associate myself closely with because of pagan doctrines. Some other people chose not to fellowship with us because of the truth. They obviously don't see it that way but I can't help it. They choose to believe what someone else tells them is the truth. I am endeavoring to find the truth. I try to approach any subject with an open mind so as not to block out the truth. If one studies anything with their mind already made up all they will do is find reasons to show themselves right. Ya know what I mean? What started me on this study was a series of things that have been shown to me over a period of many years. It wasn't until about 5 years ago when I read a copy of The Final Reformation by C.J. Koster that all of the things that I had been shown in my spirit, by the Spirit of the Most High, all came together. What I had for so long looked at as them, you know, "those other guys" as being the great whore, suddenly in a matter of hours, I understood what and who the great whore was and who her daughters are. All of the sudden it was no longer "them" but now I understood it was me too. I, in my beliefs, was no doubt in one of the daughters of the great whore spoken of in Revelation 17. Yes, her daughters are spoken of in that it says she is the mother of harlots. All who embrace her pagan doctrines and use the names of pagan deities to refer to our Heavenly Father and His Messiah are walking in her ways. They are made drunk with the wine of her fornication and filled with the names of blasphemy. First, I only studied and believed the "Bible." I was a staunch believer in the idea that the KJV was in fact the preserved word of "God." Hey, when I first became a believer, I believed exactly what I was told was the truth. My pastor wouldn't lie to me. Would he? Certainly they wouldn't have lied to me in Bible college too? Then I did word studies to find out what the "original" texts said. When what I found was not the same as what the pastor had said was there, it caused me to really start questioning. This was about 25 or 26 years ago. From there I didn't dramatically change my beliefs. However, as I went along, there were things I could not be dogmatic about as I had found them to be questionable at best. Then, after reading The Final Reformation (now re-titled: Come Out Of Her My People) the lights turned on. I began to dig deeper and deeper. I have been searching much on a historical as well as Scriptural basis. If anyone would take the time that I have they can find these things to be true; if they read works by early historians, people who read and witnessed the early manuscripts and wrote comment regarding them; if they do research in the early languages they can find that there are definite mistranslations as well as many pagan doctrines that have been intermingled and added to putrefy the true belief. It is not I who is being tossed to and fro by every wind of doctrine. I am not saying that I am without error. I am however, saying that the world has been deceived by many pagan doctrines and rituals laid out as truth. Most of us are sheep and we follow what we have been told by the "experts." How can we prove them wrong with The Dark Ages to cloak the truth in darkness? How many of us even know that there were no "J's" in the English alphabet until less than 500 years ago? How many of us know that there is no "J" sound in Hebrew, Greek, or Latin? With no "J" or "J" sound it is impossible for the Father's name to be Jehovah and it is impossible for His Messiah's name to start with a "J" as in "Jesus." How many of us know that if we ask a person who really knows how to speak Greek how to say "Jesus" he will pronounce it, "Ea-Zeus or EE-Zeus?" This means "Hail Zeus." We know who Zeus is and he is not our savior. He is not the Messiah. He is in fact false, a pagan deity, a false "god." The word "god" is also the name of a pagan mighty one. The Assyrian or Canaanite deity of fortune or luck was named god. It was his proper name. This was and is not just a title. It is the proper name of a false deity. The Scriptures tell us not to let the names of other mighty ones come out of our mouths. How then can we refer to our Heavenly Father, our true and only Mighty One, with or by the name of a pagan deity? What and where does this leave us? Doesn't it leave us in a position of judging ourselves? I know many want to look at me and judge me and my beliefs. Isn't this more of a time of introspection? This is time for all of us to question tradition. This is time for us to find the truth. Scripture states that those who worship the Father must worship Him in spirit and in truth. If we love Him with all of our hearts but do not know the truth, we can only fulfill half of that equation. Please consider carefully. In His love and service, David Allen |
Greetings: I have been reading your article on the "CROSS" and wish to share some information from my own research. I noticed that you suspect the connection of the cross (taw) with the mark of the beast. I believe your suspicions to be warranted and now maybe I can offer some further confirmation. I am a Messianic believer studying the Hebraic roots of the faith. I am working on my fifth earned degree and also conducting personal research. I have been communicating recently with other Messianic sites and sharing information from a research paper I am working on and hoping to turn into a book. In my study of the history of the cross, I am finding that its pagan origins betray a more involved deception than I imagined. Not only was it the symbol and 'mark' of the pagan god Tammuz, and a substitute for the plain object of impalement of Messiah, I have made a connection to Revelation 13:16 and the 'mark' mentioned there. More to follow later. The Hebrew text connection. The Hebrew text of Revelation. The Greek word (charagma) means a mark, and has the primary connotation of the Hebrew term "taw". However, the bombshell is found in the ancient Aramaic New Testament with Hebrew translation (Peshitta Mosul text) where I found the actual reading and spelling of 'TAV or TAW' in the text of Revelation 13:16. With this in mind, the MARK has a direct lineage to Babylon and can be positively from the Hebrew-Aramaic text's. There is a false assumption that the mark of Revelation is 666. This is the number of the name of the beast and we are told that he will cause all to receive a mark OR a number (optional) meaning they are not one and the same. The modern Hebrew translation of the New Testament translating back from greek into Hebrew also gives TAV in the text of Revelation 13:16. Another text that I am trying to obtain is the Revelation Aramaic text (Crawford Aramaic text) of Revelation, John Rylands Musem in England, to see if it also contains this reading. One of the Teffilin worn on the forehead of Hebrew men contained the Name YHWH. The High priest also had on his Mitre the Name YHWH. the 144000 of Revelation have the Fathers Name written on their foreheads, all in opposition the the name, or letter of the name of the beast. It should be noted that the second beast (religious leader or Prophet issues the "mark," not the first beast. We immediately see a religious connection. Its interesting to note that in pagan practices the initial letter T was placed upon the foreheads of the initiates. More to come later. Thank you for permitting me to share this information. |
This page was last updated on: 2/26/02
